The add-on modules for designing structural member components according to national, European, and international standards also show design results in addition to numerical output in tables graphically, as diagrams displayed on the framework.
In RFEM 5 and RSTAB 8, you can generate surface loads like wind and snow by means of the implemented load generator. On frameworks, these surface loads are also displayed as surface loads in the graphic by default.
In RFEM, structures can be modeled and analyzed in a spatial environment. The permanent 3D visualization helps you to better understand complex models and to represent the force flux. However, you can switch from a spatial mode to a planar sheet mode in the documentation of a calculation. To do this, you have to describe the spatial calculation of the structure with all the necessary properties on "flat" paper pages for an independent reader. Usually, you try to display the load actions and the corresponding results by using an orthogonal view of the substructure of the entire structure. Obviously, the load symbols depicted in the 3D mode in a view perpendicular to the load become unrecognizable due the missing expansion. In order to be still able to create a clear representation of all information, the corresponding adjustments are available in RFEM.
In spatial structures, the member position plays an important role in terms of determining internal forces. The orientation of member axes can be defined either by a global cross-section rotation angle, or by a specific member rotation angle. These two angles are added to determine the position of the main axes of a member in a 3D model.
The form-finding process in RF-FORM-FINDING displaces the corner nodes of FE elements of a membrane surface in space until the defined surface stress is in equilibrium with the boundary conditions. This displacement is independent of the element geometry. In the case of elements with four corner nodes, the free displacement may cause spatial drilling in the element plane and thus exceed the validity limits of the calculation; therefore, triangular elements are generally recommended for form‑finding systems. Triangular elements remain independent of the corner node displacement and stay within the calculation limitations.
In the following example, the stability analysis of a steel frame can be performed according to the General Method in compliance with EN 1993‑1‑1, Sect. 6.3.4 in the RF‑/STEEL EC3 add-on module. The first of my three posts shows the determination of the critical load factor for design loads required by the design concept, which reaches the elastic critical buckling load with deformations from the main framework plane.